Deconstructing the Categorical Interpretations of Plato

Abstract

A number of feminist scholars have branded Plato as a misogynist, while others have taken the stance that he was a feminist. However, these modern categorizations of a philosopher who lived and wrote over two thousand years ago ought not to deter us from engaging with his dialogues. Instead, we should approach Platonic dialogues with an openness that acknowledges but does not dwell on the time that has passed and the subsequent changes that have come with it. We must actively engage with the dialogue, taking into account the place, the people, and the words themselves. The written word must be understood as the spoken word, with all its ironic elements and dualities revealed. The thesis being presented follows this line of action, looking to engage not only with Platonic philosophy but also with its critics using the approach set out by Hans-Georg Gadamer and Jacob Klein in their studies of Plato and his works.

Discipline: Political Science Honours

Faculty Mentor: Dr. Gaelan Murphy