The Unsolved Mysteries of Applied Behaviour Analysis

Abstract

Knowledge and awareness of Behaviourism and the practice of Applied Behaviour Analysis vary across students and academics. Despite the introduction of certification and an ethical code for behaviour analysts and the advocacy of several groups, a consensus in the representation of Behaviour Analysis remains elusive. Textbooks and instruction at all levels of education can wildly differ in the presentation of Behaviour Analysis and Behaviourism. Inaccurate information can be dangerous and could mislead those who could benefit from Behaviour Analytic interventions from receiving effective treatment. Behaviour Analysis has long been recognized as the gold standard of treatment in patients with autism spectrum disorder and harm can be placed upon clients who are led to believe in the myths surrounding ABA. In the current study, we will analyze various textbooks and surveys filled out by undergraduate students and faculty to ascertain their knowledge of Behaviourism and ABA and attempt to analyze the variance in the knowledge and representation of ABA and Behaviourism. It is expected that the results will replicate the results denoted in past studies will exist within students and facility alike as well as the textbooks. The aim of this study is to increase the accurate representation of the theory of behaviourism and practice of ABA to ensure clients and consumers of science alike are exposed to accurate information to make choices in academic pursuits, employment and treatment options.

Faculty Mentor: Miranda Macauley