Divisions in Treaty 6 Perspectives: the dilemma of written text and oral tradition

Authors

  • Miriam Lily Wing Grant Macewan University and University of Alberta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31542/j.muse.220

Abstract

Since the signing of Treaty 6 in 1876, there has been ongoing controversy between the First Nations and the Canadian government regarding the understanding and fulfillment of the treaty terms. Through investigating both historical texts and oral tradition, this article hopes to give insight on the modern dilemma of treaty rights in the specific case of Treaty 6. In order for the most accurate understanding of Treaty 6 to be obtained, First Nations oral tradition and perspectives must be considered as valid evidence.

Author Biography

  • Miriam Lily Wing, Grant Macewan University and University of Alberta
    I am a Bachelor of Elementary Education Transfer Student in my fourth year of studies.
MUSe cover for volume 3

Downloads

Published

2016-11-25

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)

Section

Arts and Sciences - Humanities

License

By publishing works in MUSe, authors and creators retain copyright under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license, which allows others to share these works for non-commercial purposes as long as credit is given. The MUSe Editorial Board reserves the right to make copy-editing changes to works prior to publication to ensure they conform to the publication's style and quality standards. The Editorial Board also reserves the right to archive published submissions in MacEwan University's institutional repository, RO@M.

How to Cite

Divisions in Treaty 6 Perspectives: the dilemma of written text and oral tradition. (2016). MacEwan University Student EJournal, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.31542/j.muse.220